Feldman & Pinto

Banner

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Investigations
  • News
    • Firm News
    • Law News
  • Contact Us

Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Gall Bladder Disease: A Comparative Safety Study

The Canadian Medical Association Journal has recently conducted a comparative study regarding the  use of oral contraceptives and gall bladder disease. An excerpt from this study is listed below.

Background: Recent concerns have been raised about the risk of gallbladderdisease associated with the use of drospirenone, a fourth-generationprogestin used in oral contraceptives. We conducted a studyto determine the magnitude of this risk compared with otherformulations of oral contraceptives.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the IMS LifeLinkHealth Plan Claims Database. We included women who were usingan oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol combinedwith a progestin during 1997–2009. To be eligible, womenhad to have been taking the oral contraceptive continuouslyfor at least six months. We computed adjusted rate ratios (RRs)for gallbladder disease using a Cox proportional hazards model.In the primary analysis, gallbladder disease was defined ascholecystectomy; in a secondary analysis, it was defined ashospital admission secondary to gallbladder disease.

Results: We included 2 721 014 women in the cohort, 27 087 of whom underwentsurgical or laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the follow-upperiod. Compared with levonorgestrel, an older second-generationprogestin, a small, statistically significant in crease in therisk ofgallbladder disease was associated with desogestrel (adjustedRR 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.09), drospirenone(adjusted RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.16–1.26) and norethindrone(adjusted RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.14). No statisticallysignificant increase in risk was associated with the other formulationsof oral contraceptive (ethynodiol diacetate, norgestrel andnorgestimate).

Mahyar Etminan, Joseph A.C. Delaney, Brian Bressler and James M. Brophy

* To Read This Entire Article Please Follow the Link Below:

 http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/abstract/cmaj.110161v1?ijkey=4c9d9f33ee64ea8b37692cae2f3af4c7be20a65c&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha

 

 

< Prev   Next >

Latest Law News

  • FDA Reviewing Stronger Warning Labels Regarding Blood Clots on Yaz Labels  
  • Hot Coffee Trailer 
  • Meme-Busting: Tort Reform = Cost Control 
  • FDA Warns Not to Feed Simply Thick to Premature Infants  
  • Birth Control Pills Containing Drospirenone: Possible Increased Risk of Blood Clots  
  • Paxil Cases Assigned to Savage, Over GlaxoSmithKline's Protests 
  • Judge Rules GSK's 'Nerve Center' in Phila. for Paxil Suits 
  • Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Gall Bladder Disease: A Comparative Safety Study 
  • Asthma Relieving Advair Linked to Severe Asthma Attacks 
  • Wicked Understudy Sues Bayer Claiming Yasmin Caused Stroke 
  • Zicam Not Alone in Reports of Side Effects 
  • Yaz & The New York Times  
  • Paxil Related Birth Defects 
  • Early Cancer Diagnosis 
  • Diabetic Footcare 
  • Fines Unlikely to End Off-Label Drug Marketing 
  • Pfizer Expected to Pay Record Settlement to U.S. 
  • High Stakes for Merck in Litigation on Fosamax 
  • Bausch & Lomb Beats Back Lens-Cleaner Lawsuits 
  • 13 Years Later, Medical Malpractice Case Settled 


  • Home
  • About Us
  • Practice Areas
  • Case Investigations
  • News
  • Contact Us

All website content ©2013 Feldman & Pinto, All Rights Reserved | Contact Feldman & Pinto

FELDMAN & PINTO, ATTORNEYS AT LAW. 1604 Locust St, 2R  ·  Philadelphia, PA 19103  ·  Phone: 215-546-2604  ·  Fax: 215-546-9904

Disclaimer: Submissions of information through our online feature does not guarantee or create an attorney-client relationship between Feldman & Pinto and the person or entity submitting information. Feldman & Pinto will treat all submissions as confidential; however, we cannot guarantee the security of all online transmissions.